Secure verifications for every industry
We provide templated identity verification workflows for common industries and can further design tailored workflows for your specific business.

Four months after hackers stole 70,000 government IDs from a Discord vendor, the platform is now asking all of its 200 million users to prove their age — and many of them want nothing to do with it.
Discord announced in February 2026 that it will begin a "phased global rollout" of age assurance in early March, defaulting all users to "teen-appropriate" experiences. To access adult content or modify safety settings, users will be asked to either submit a video selfie or upload a government-issued ID through k-ID, a third-party age verification provider also used by Meta and Snap. The announcement landed directly into a community that had just spent four months processing the fallout from Discord's September 2025 data breach, in which a single compromised support agent gave hackers access to 70,000 government ID images.
The response was immediate. Google searches for Discord alternatives spiked worldwide. Hundreds of users on Reddit announced they were cancelling Nitro subscriptions or deleting accounts entirely. "Hell, Discord has already had one ID breach, why the f*** would anyone verify on it after that?" one user wrote on a gaming subreddit. "This is how Discord dies," declared another.
The backlash reached well beyond anonymous forum posts. Eret, a Twitch streamer with over one million followers, told the BBC that he runs a 60,000-member Discord server and has no intention of complying. "I really do not want to send Discord my ID given their track record — I do not trust them," he said. Tubbo, a British content creator with 5.2 million Twitch followers, also said he would not trust Discord's assurances that identity data would be kept secure.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation condemned the rollout directly, noting that Discord had gone beyond what any applicable law requires. "EFF encourages all services to stop adopting these systems when they are not mandated by law," the organisation wrote, framing voluntary age verification as both a censorship and a surveillance risk. The EFF also flagged that Discord's prior age verification vendor, Persona, drew scrutiny for being backed by an investment firm co-founded by Peter Thiel.
Discord's revised system relies on k-ID, which uses on-device facial age estimation technology from Swiss company Privately. According to a k-ID spokesperson quoted by Ars Technica, no video or image data ever leaves the user's device: "The only data to leave the device is a pass/fail of the age threshold which is what Discord receives." For users who opt to submit a government ID instead of a face scan, that verification does occur off-device, with Discord stating that documents are deleted immediately after the age check completes.
Following the initial wave of backlash, Discord also clarified that the "vast majority" of users will not face an age check at all. A new "age inference" system draws on account tenure, device signals, and platform activity patterns to sort most adults automatically — without any biometric or document submission. Only users seeking to access age-restricted content who cannot be confirmed via inference will be directed to the verification flow.
Even with on-device processing for facial estimation, a structural vulnerability remains. The October 2025 breach did not occur because Discord collected face scans — it occurred because the manual appeals process required government documents to be held within a third-party vendor's support system, accessible via a single compromised agent's credentials. Replacing the vendor does not eliminate that architecture.
As the State of Surveillance reported, conflicting accounts suggest the October breach may have affected far more users than Discord's official figure of 70,000, with attackers claiming up to 2.1 million ID photos were exfiltrated. Discord disputed the scope as an extortion tactic. The underlying point — that centralised identity document handling creates a target — is not in dispute.
The technical path away from this problem already exists. Zero-knowledge proofs in identity verification allow a platform to confirm a user meets an age threshold without the platform or any vendor ever receiving the underlying credential. Decentralised PII storage eliminates the document honeypot entirely by design. The question for any platform collecting identity data under age verification mandates is no longer whether these architectures exist — it is whether they will be adopted before the next breach forces the conversation.
Discord's March rollout proceeds on schedule. The trust deficit from October 2025 has no announced remediation date.
We provide templated identity verification workflows for common industries and can further design tailored workflows for your specific business.